Obama an Idol?

By Idolworldadmin on April 3, 2009 7:43 PM | 4 Comments | 0 TrackBacks

Infowars.com
March 27, 2009

Retired U.S. Navy officer Walter Francis Fitzpatrick III has accused Obama of treason. In a complaint addressed to Obama via U.S Attorney Russell Dedrick and Assistant U.S. Attorney Edward Schmutzer, Eastern District, Tennessee, Fitzpatrick wrote the following (also posted on his blog):

To Mr. Barack Obama

	"Posing as an impostor president and commander in chief you have stripped civilian command and control over the military establishment. Known military criminal actors -- command racketeers -- are now free in the exercise of military government intent upon destruction of America's constitutional government."

Via: U.S Attorney Russell Dedrick, and Assistant U.S. Attorney Edward Schmutzer, Eastern
District, Tennessee

From: Walter Francis Fitzpatrick, III, United States Navy Retired

Distribution: Wide

SUBJECT: CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS REGARDING THE COMMISSION OF TREASON

I have observed and extensively recorded invidious attacks by military-political aristocrats against the Constitution for twenty years.

Now you have broken in and entered the White House by force of contrivance, concealment, conceit, dissembling, and deceit. Posing as an impostor president and commander in chief you have stripped civilian command and control over the military establishment. Known military criminal actors -- command racketeers -- are now free in the exercise of military government intent upon destruction of America's constitutional government.

Free from constitutional restraint, and following your criminal example, military commanders deployed U.S. Army active duty combat troops into the small civilian community of Samson, Alabama last week in a demonstration of their newly received despotic, domestic police power.

We come now to this reckoning. I accuse you and your military-political criminal assistants of TREASON. I name you and your military criminal associates as traitors. Your criminal ascension manifests a clear and present danger. You fundamentally changed our form of government. The Constitution no longer works.

Confident holding your silent agreement and admission, I identify you as a foreign born domestic enemy.

My sworn duty Mr. Obama is to stand against what you stand for. You are not my president. You are not my commander in chief.

Obedient to the Constitution in submission of this criminal accusation I remain steadfast, and

Born fighting,
/s/ (notarized)
Walter Francis Fitzpatrick, III
United States Naval Academy, Class of 1975
Posted this date via priority, certified mail#: 7008 3230 0003 1463 3346

According to WorldNetDaily, Mr. Fitzpatrick was visited by the Secret Service after filing his complaint. After it was determined Fitzpatrick did not pose a threat to the president, the Secret Service left. "Officials with the Knoxville office of the Secret Service told WND the only person who could release information to the media was on vacation and they would not comment on the issue," Bob Unruh wrote for WND on March 25.

On March 24, the Supreme Court and the U.S. Justice Department confirmed receipt of documentation challenging Barack Obama's eligibility to be president.

On December 8, 2008, the Supreme Court turned down an emergency appeal from Leo Donofrio of East Brunswick, N.J., to intervene in the presidential election. Donofrio claims Obama had dual nationality at birth -- his mother was American and his Kenyan father at the time was a British subject -- and thus he cannot possibly be a "natural born citizen," one of the requirements the Constitution lists for eligibility to be president, according to the Chicago Tribune.

Pennsylvania Democrat Philip J. Berg sued Sen. Barack Obama, the Democratic National Committee and the Federal Election Commission last year claiming Obama is not a natural-born citizen and thus not eligible to be president of the United States. Judge R. Barclay Surrick dismissed the case on October 24, 2008. Surrick concluded that ordinary citizens can't sue to ensure that a presidential candidate actually meets the constitutional requirements of the office, WND reported at the time.

Surrick deferred to Congress and said the legislature must determine if "citizens, voters, or party members should police the Constitution's eligibility requirements for the Presidency."

Ummm WTF? is this guy right in his alligations on our president? wrong? Tell us how you feel about this! Is the Constitution under attack by our current Govt?